Active risk, also known as tracking error, is a crucial concept in investment management, measuring the degree to which a portfolio’s return deviates from its benchmark index. It quantifies the risk undertaken by an active manager in their pursuit of outperforming the market.
Understanding active risk is paramount for both portfolio managers and investors. For managers, it’s a gauge of their strategy’s deviation from a passive approach and the volatility associated with those deviations. A higher active risk signifies a more aggressive strategy, while a lower active risk indicates a more conservative, benchmark-aware approach.
From an investor’s perspective, active risk provides insights into the potential for both outperformance and underperformance relative to the benchmark. A high active risk suggests the possibility of significant gains, but also carries the greater risk of substantial losses compared to simply mirroring the index. Investors must assess their risk tolerance and investment goals to determine an acceptable level of active risk.
Active risk can arise from several sources. Asset allocation decisions contribute when a portfolio’s asset class weights differ significantly from the benchmark. Security selection plays a major role as managers choose individual stocks or bonds they believe will outperform those included in the index. Sector allocation, where the portfolio overweights or underweights specific industries, also adds to active risk. Finally, market timing, attempts to predict market movements and adjust portfolio positions accordingly, can be a significant contributor to active risk, and often a detrimental one.
Calculating active risk typically involves determining the standard deviation of the difference between the portfolio’s returns and the benchmark’s returns over a specific period. This is usually expressed as an annualized percentage. For example, an active risk of 5% means that the portfolio’s return, on average, is expected to deviate from the benchmark’s return by 5% per year, either positively or negatively.
While active risk is often associated with active management, even passively managed portfolios can exhibit some degree of tracking error due to factors like fund expenses, sampling techniques used to replicate the index, or differences in the timing of dividend reinvestments. However, the active risk in such passively managed funds is usually significantly lower than that of actively managed funds.
Managing active risk effectively requires a clear understanding of the investment strategy and the sources of deviations from the benchmark. Managers can use techniques like factor analysis and risk budgeting to identify and control specific risk factors. Investors should carefully evaluate a manager’s track record, investment philosophy, and active risk profile to determine if it aligns with their objectives and risk tolerance. Ultimately, successful active risk management involves striking a balance between the potential for outperformance and the acceptance of potential underperformance.